Affichage des articles dont le libellé est IP. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est IP. Afficher tous les articles

mercredi 8 août 2012

The success of IPTVs keep television relevant with connected content

A lire sur:  http://www.atelier.net/node/409105
Par Ivory King 07 août 2012 connected screen with images of programs

Most Americans watch traditional TV, but connected TV purchases are rising. This could increase content consumption but will influence the industry with its increased bandwidth demands.
Despite its veteran status, television still is the main platform for watching content. Americans watch one screen or another for 35 hours each week, 94 percent of which is on a traditional TV. Though much of TV distribution is broadcast or cable, Internet Protocol television - IPTV - is influencing growth in viewing options while still reinforcing the TV’s position as main video device. These devices play regular programming and also connect to home broadband to stream video services from Netflix, Amazon, etc. The spread of IPTV is unique compared to other devices, since its expanded features are built into devices that people have and continued to purchase. As of February of this year, 10.4 percent of homes had an IPTV, up from 4.7 percent at the same time in 2011.
Connected TVs reinforce the television screen…
Instead of cannibalizing another device’s market share, IPTV increases the feature set of traditional TV sets, driving purchases within the category, as Nielsen’s reports. So while television usage remains strong, connected TVs support usage and increase the adoption of streaming features. This directly opposes the trends seen in once essential stand-alone devices; VCR and DVD player sales decreased over the same period. DVRs, however, are now found in 44 percent of homes, so the category of set-top boxes may not yet be a maximized category.
… And make bandwidth a priority for the media industry
Trend confirmation can already be seen from industry support - IP-based devices for watching video are currently being prioritized by media companies. Time Warner Cable is deploying new gateway DVR devices, and increase support to more connected devices, such as IPTVs and video game consoles. This initial move may indicate the next struggle in TV broadcast - the demand for bandwidth will increase dramatically with higher penetration of connected TVs. ValueMarkconsiders the possibility of Google’s ISP offering, which will surpass speeds of 1GBPS. This and other future entries into the industry could finally offer consumers a viable media offering that competes with traditional telecoms.

jeudi 21 juillet 2011

Google ready to settle with Oracle over Android IP?

By Larry Dignan | July 20, 2011, 2:20pm PDT

Summary

Google and Oracle continue to bicker over whether their courtroom battle over whether Android infringes on Java patents, but there’s at least a hint that the search giant may want to settle out of court.

Blogger Info

Larry Dignan
Andrew Nusca
Rachel King

Google and Oracle continue to bicker over whether their courtroom battle over whether Android infringes on Java patents, but there’s at least a hint that the search giant may want to settle out of court.

The two parties filed a joint response focusing on whether their trial should be stayed as Oracle’s patent standing is resolved. Not surprisingly, Google wants a stay. Oracle wants to go to trial without a stay so it can pelt Google with every patent it has. Florian Mueller has the recap of the stay issue and the Oracle and Google back and forth.

However, the one line that caught Mueller’s eye is the passage below. The document is embedded via Scribd below.

Indeed, should this case be narrowed to only a few claims modified in the course of the reexamination, any damages claim would be materially limited by, among other things, the doctrine of intervening rights. Such a narrowed case will also eliminate the need for those efforts specifically directed at the claims rejected through reexamination, including motion practice, expert reports, and other trial preparation, as well as make it more likely that the parties could reach an informal resolution of the matter. In short, both parties and the Court would benefit from a stay pending reexamination.

Informal resolution? Google appears to be willing to pass a few billion to resolve this IP nightmare.

Mueller noted:

In principle, it’s constructive if a party indicates a willingness to settle. But there’s a fundamental difference between negotiating in private and letting the court (as well as the public) know — more than three months before the scheduled trial (!) — that one isn’t so sure of one’s defenses anymore. This stands in clear contradiction to Google’s past positions and declarations, and it looks increasingly like an admission all by itself. Discovery is almost complete, and it probably didn’t go too well for Google.

In other words, Oracle clearly has Google in the crosshairs. Oracle argued that the case needs to be resolved quickly because Android is gaining share and the infringement will only get worse. The possible outcomes go like this:

  • The judge decides on a stay and the two parties may settle.
  • The judge agrees with Oracle and this lawsuit goes to trial. A good scenario for Oracle.
  • Oracle sees that “informal resolution” remark and the two parties start talking.

Also see:

googorcl072011

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/google-ready-to-settle-with-oracle-over-android-ip/52884